Which platform should we choose?
Depends on your team's skills, support contracts and whether multi-vendor independence matters. The assessment answers it with numbers; we deploy all three.
Markets · Enterprise
Three-tier out, EVPN fabric in, no maintenance weekend.
Enterprises modernising a datacenter network or leaving a vendor need a program, not a project: inventory, twin-validated design, waves, verification, operations. We run them on Juniper Apstra, Cisco ACI or Arista CloudVision — and we tell you which fits.
What your team will ask us
01
02
How do you avoid downtime?
Parallel running, wave planning by dependency, twin-validated cutovers and rollback that is tested but rarely used — zero rollbacks used to date on twin-gated programs.
03
What happens after go-live?
Handover to your team with the repository and runbooks, or our AIOps operations with the live portal. Your choice at any point.
Regulations and how we address them
| Platforms | Juniper Apstra, Cisco ACI and Nexus Dashboard, Arista CloudVision. |
|---|---|
| Migrations | Cisco → Juniper, ACI → Apstra, NSX exit, Dell → Arista/Juniper, Brocade → Juniper. |
| Operating model | Fabric as code, digital twin gate, live health portal. |
What you receive
- Platform recommendation with cost comparison
- Wave plan with per-wave verification
- Repository and runbooks
- Optional managed operations
Relevant services
Playbook · 8 pages
Vendor migration playbook
How a SpineRail migration program runs: discovery inventory, translation rules, wave planning, twin validation, cutover method of procedure, verification and decommissioning. Cisco→Juniper, ACI→Apstra, NSX exit.